Each “Analyze a quarrel” essay is going to be scored on a 6-point scale that is holistic to the criteria below.

Each “Analyze a quarrel” essay is going to be scored on a 6-point scale that is holistic to the criteria below.

A single combined score is reported because it is more reliable than either task score alone although the GRE ® Analytical Writing measure contains two discrete analytical writing tasks. The score reported will represent the common for the scores for the two tasks.

Score of 6 Outstanding

A 6 paper presents a cogent, well-articulated critique of the argument and conveys meaning skillfully.

A typical paper in this category:

  • clearly identifies important options that come with the argument and analyzes them insightfully
  • develops ideas cogently, organizes them logically and connects all of them with clear transitions
  • effectively supports the primary points associated with the critique
  • demonstrates control of language, including appropriate word choice and sentence variety
  • demonstrates facility utilizing the conventions (in other words., grammar, usage and mechanics) of standard written English but may have errors that are minor

Score of 5 Strong

A 5 paper presents a generally thoughtful, well-developed critique regarding the argument and conveys meaning clearly.

A typical paper in this category:

  • clearly identifies important attributes of the argument and analyzes them in a way that is generally perceptive
  • develops ideas clearly, organizes them logically and connects them with appropriate transitions
  • sensibly supports the primary points associated with the critique
  • demonstrates control of language, including appropriate word choice and sentence variety
  • demonstrates facility utilizing the conventions of standard written English, but might have minor errors

Score of 4 Adequate

A 4 paper presents a critique that is competent of argument and conveys meaning adequately.

A typical paper in this category:

  • identifies and analyzes important features of the argument
  • develops and organizes ideas satisfactorily, but might not connect them with transitions
  • supports the key points of the critique
  • demonstrates sufficient control of language to state ideas with reasonable clarity
  • generally demonstrates control of the conventions of standard written English, but might have some errors

Score of 3 Limited

A buy essay 3 paper demonstrates some competence in its critique of this argument and in conveying meaning, but is obviously flawed.

A typical paper in this category exhibits one or more of this following characteristics:

  • does not identify or analyze most of the important attributes of the argument, while some analysis regarding the argument is present
  • mainly analyzes tangential or irrelevant matters, or reasons poorly
  • is restricted into the logical development and organization of ideas
  • offers support of little relevance and value for points associated with critique
  • lacks clarity in expressing ideas
  • contains occasional errors that are major frequent minor errors in grammar, usage or mechanics that will interfere with meaning

Score of 2 Seriously Flawed

A 2 paper demonstrates weaknesses that are serious analytical writing.

A typical paper in this category exhibits a number of regarding the following characteristics:

  • will not present a critique based on logical analysis, but may instead present the writer’s own views on the subject
  • Does not develop ideas or is illogical and disorganized
  • provides little if any relevant or support that is reasonable
  • Has problems that are serious the application of language plus in sentence structure that frequently interfere with meaning
  • contains serious errors in grammar, usage or mechanics that frequently meaning that is obscure

Score of 1 Fundamentally Deficient

A 1 paper demonstrates fundamental deficiencies in analytical writing.

A typical paper in this category exhibits one or more regarding the following characteristics:

  • provides little if any evidence of the ability to understand and analyze the argument
  • provides little or no proof of the capability to develop an organized response
  • has severe problems in language and sentence structure that persistently interfere with meaning
  • Contains errors that are pervasive grammar, usage or mechanics that bring about incoherence